California lawyer Ashley Conlogue dumped her as a client? Conlogue appears to have been fired.

It appears that * no longer has legal representation in Los Angeles, California. Did her attorney dump her because she lied to her attorney and the court? Did the law firm fire Ashley Conlogue after she was severely reprimanded and sanctioned by Judge Robert Hess? Who knows. Still the attorney or firm had to notify the court the moment they no longer represented her. They did not because I bet * instructed them not to do so. That means they legally were representing her for the last few months. The law firm is still liable for removing my confidential data from online.

There was an automatic court update to my California case. The clerk stated that email to Ashley Conlogue was not being answered. The Court stated they received this reply,

"I am away from the office beginning Friday, May 19, 2017.  This email address is not being forwarded to another attorney at the firm.  Thus, if you have received this message, please re-send your correspondence to Christian S. Molnar, at cmolnar@arendsenlaw.com, and Neelam Molnar, at NMolnar@arendsenlaw.com

Court then stated this,

"Arendsen Cane Molnar Law:
          Ms. Conlogue automatic email notification has advised that she is out of the office and to forward her emails to Christian S. Molnar, at cmolnar@arendsenlaw.com, and Neelam Molnar, at NMolnar@arendsenlaw.com.
          If Ms. Conlogue is no longer the handling attorney in this matter please serve and file a change of handling attorney with this Court within 5 days of the date of this email.
          Please do not email it directly to me; consider E-filing at: http://www.courts.ca.gov/8872.htm
          Thank you,

Becky L. Fisher, Supervising Deputy Clerk"

The court contacted Christian Molnar today 062217 and received this reply,

"Subject: Re: B278893 - Bat World Sanctuary et al v. Cummins [ Trial Court Case No: BS140207 ]

We haven't been the attorneys of record for several months.

Cordially,

Christian S. Molnar
Litigation Attorney
Arendsen Cane Molnar LLP
Beverly Hills—San Diego
315 S. Beverly Dr.,Suite 320
Beverly Hills, California 90210

Then the court sent this email. Clerk doesn't realize Christian is a male,

"Ms. Molnar:
          Please file a substitution of attorney. Our records reflect that Conlogue of Arendsen Cane Molnar, LLP remain as counsel for respondent.  Until receive notice otherwise, Arendsen remains as counsel of record.
Thank you,


Becky L. Fisher, Supervising Deputy Clerk "

Mary Cummins vs Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Amicus letter filed on my behalf. Case submitted to Appeals Court. Mary Cummins, freedom of speech.

An amicus brief was filed on my behalf. They're not arguments I didn't raise but I'm still thankful. Time will tell if there will be justice in Texas. In the meantime Randy Turner and his client Amanda Lollar keep posting crazy, libelous material about me. I'm not even going to mention the crazy things. Turner is an attorney. He knows full well what he is doing is wrong and libelous.

A.B.

June 6, 2017

Fax 806 342 2650
Clerk, Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas
Potter County Courts Building
501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A
Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

RE: Case Number: 07-16-00337-CV, Trial Court Case Number: 2015-002259-3, Cummins v. Lollar

To the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas:

     I write as a proponent of free speech an amicus curiae to express the following concerns about the motion to dismiss a cause for defamation that is under appeal. I have an interest in libel law and the application of fair procedures for resolving such libel suits.

     I file this amicus curiae using only initials. The last two lawyers who filed amicus curiae in the previous identical case, David Cassellman and Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen, were harassed and defamed by Plaintiff Ms. Lollar and her lawyer. A woman claiming to be a lawyer from Mr. Turner's office contacted the lawyers to defame Defendant Cummins and demand that their amicus be retracted. The lawyers refused. Thereafter Plaintiff Ms. Lollar and her lawyer harassed these lawyers on the internet on multiple blogs and websites.

     The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that the right to anonymous free speech is protected by the First Amendment. A frequently cited 1995 Supreme Court ruling in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission reads, “Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. . . It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation . . . at the hand of an intolerant society.”

Facts and Statements of the Case

     A previous similar case was filed by Plaintiff Ms. Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary against Defendant Cummins in 2010, 352-248169-10. In that case Plaintiff never stated what items they believed were defamatory. Plaintiff never stated that Plaintiff Ms. Lollar suffered any damages or showed proof of any damages or causation. Plaintiff has not had a paying job in over 25 years. Plaintiff did not show the elements of defamation or breach of contract. Plaintiff waited until the last minute of their closing argument to ask the Judge for the first time for an award in the range of four to eight million dollars for Plaintiff Ms. Lollar. Judge Brigham awarded $6,000,000 in defamation damages to Plaintiff Ms. Lollar, $176,000 in legal fees and $10,000 in liquidated damages.

     Defendant Cummins appealed. Two amicus briefs were written on behalf of Defendant by the previously mentioned lawyers. The Appeals court reversed the breach of contract claims, lawyer’s fees and liquidated damages. Through an 18 months long act of legal gymnastics, misquoting the record, making false assumptions, misinterpreting common law that undermined the rule of law the defamation judgment of $6,000,000 remained.

     It should be noticed here that lawyer Mr. Turner has a special relationship with the Justices in the Second Court of Appeals. Mr. Turner has stated many times to the media that he wanted to be the first attorney to find for sentimental value of a dog. Mr. Turner stated it was his main goal for his legal career. In Medlens v Carla Strickland, 02-11-00105-CV, the three Justice panel voted unanimously for the Medlens. They ruled that dogs can have great sentimental and monetary value even though all case law states dogs are considered personal property.
     Strickland, an Animal Control Officer at a public animal shelter, appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas. Many amicus briefs were submitted on behalf of Strickland. Justice Willett who wrote the opinion upheld the 126-year-old precedent maintaining pets as personal property. The Supreme Court was unanimous in its decision overturning the lower Court’s unanimous decision. Justice Willett even stated on the record to lawyer John Cayce who represented Strickland that the case should have been dismissed in the trial court. Cayce who was previously the Chief Justice of the Second Court of Appeals of Texas agreed and stated “my old court got it wrong.” So too did the panel on the previous case here quite possibly because of the same close relationship between Mr. Turner, his wife, also a lawyer, and the Justices of the Second Court of Appeals. For these reasons the Supreme Court of Texas transferred the case from the Second Court of Appeals to the Seventh Court of Appeals of T
 exas.

     In this current case Plaintiff Ms. Lollar filed another complaint for defamation against Defendant Cummins mere days after the Appeals Court released its opinion. It’s just about an exact duplicate of the initial 2010 complaint. The complaint again had no exhibits and did not state what Plaintiff believed was defamatory. It also referenced an alleged contract which the Appeals Court had reversed to try to claim jurisdiction in Tarrant County, Texas.

     Since the previous case was filed Texas has worked to reduce the massive amount of frivolous defamation lawsuits meant to stifle freedom of speech such as this case. The Texas Citizens Participation Act was signed into law on June 17, 2011 to help protect Freedom of Speech. June 14, 2013 Governor Perry also signed into law HB 1759 adopting the Defamation Mitigation Act demonstrating continued support of free speech for all. The bill was passed by more than a two-thirds majority of each chamber and, as a result, it became law on June 14, 2013.

     July 2015 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss per the Citizen Participation Act, Defamation Mitigation Act, Statute of Limitations and Lack of Jurisdiction. September 2015 Plaintiff filed a reply to the Motion to Dismiss. Defendant then filed an amended Motion to Dismiss also adding the causes of forgery and perjury as Plaintiff forged their exhibits. Because Defendant has never defamed Plaintiff, Plaintiff had to forge exhibits all conveniently just barely within the statute of limitations. Almost every blog and Twitter account they include as evidence do not exist on the Internet. Plaintiff signed a sworn declaration stating the exhibits were exact copies of the originals which are still located online in their original form. Plaintiff even included three different copies of a forged email from the head of the Federal USDA which amounts to impersonating a Government Official. That emails cleared Plaintiff Ms. Lollar of all violations of the Animal Welfare Act even thou
 gh Ms. L
 ollar lost her USDA permit years earlier because she caused bats “pain, suffering,” “death,” and “violated the Animal Welfare Act.” That forged email and a 2011 real email from the main veterinarian of the USDA are the basis of Ms. Lollar’s current defamation case. Defendant didn’t write either of the years old emails. Ms. Lollar is merely embarrassed by her cruel actions and wants the items removed from the Internet. Plaintiff’s exhibits are not exact copies of the original documents or even any document. This is perjury.

     Plaintiff’s lawyer Mr. Turner knows his client committed forgery and perjury yet Mr. Turner did not notify the Court as he must per Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof. Conduct, 2011 Rule 1.05(g)(h), Rule 1.02(c), “A lawyer shall not assist or counsel a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.”

     This behavior is also a violation of Rule 3.03(a)(1)(2)(5), “Candor Toward the Tribunal; (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal; (2) fail to disclose a fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act; (5) offer or use evidence that the lawyer knows to be false;(b) If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall make a good faith effort to persuade the client to authorize the lawyer to correct or withdraw the false evidence. If such efforts are unsuccessful, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure of the true facts.”

     For these reasons Plaintiff Ms. Lollar should be prosecuted. Plaintiff’s lawyer Mr. Turner should be prosecuted and disciplined by the State Bar of Texas.

The Court Order Should Be Reversed Under the Doctrine of Unclean Hands.

     Because Plaintiff forged the exhibits and committed perjury in a sworn statement, Plaintiff has unclean hands. The defense of “unclean hands,” which bars equitable relief when the Plaintiff “has engaged in unlawful or inequitable conduct with regard to the issue in dispute” and such conduct has injured the Defendant, See In re Francis, 186 S.W.3d 534, 551 (Tex 2006) (Wainwright, dissenting) (citing Right to Life Advocates, Inc. v. Aaron Women's Clinic, 737 S.W.2d 564, 571–72 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied) and Grohn v. Marquardt, 657 S.W.2d 851, 855 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1983, writ ref'd)); see also Truly v. Austin, 744 S.W.2d 934, 938 (Tex. 1988) (“It is well-settled that a party seeking an equitable remedy must do equity and come to court with clean hands.”).

     Plaintiff Ms. Lollar does not come with clean hands. The fact that Ms. Lollar had to forge defamatory exhibits against herself shows that there is no real evidence of defamation to be found. There is no need to even argue defamation at this point even though Defendant Ms. Cummins does argue defamation in appeal.

Conclusion

     For these reasons, the Court should reverse the court order and dismiss the underlying trial case. Furthermore the Court should refer Plaintiff Ms. Lollar for prosecution and Plaintiff’s lawyer Mr. Turner for prosecution and discipline by the State Bar of Texas.

Respectfully yours,


______XX__________________
A.B.

cc: Randall Turner, Esquire, Fax 817 887 5717
    Mary Cummins, Pro Se, Fax 310 494 9395

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxE8KfVPjYF4RFV6YmRkc0lEWHM/view?usp=sharing

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Hunt Conlogue was sanctioned and fined by the Court for contempt of court orders, violations redaction rule

Here is more evidence of Ashley Marie Conlogue, Ashley Hunt a Los Angeles, California lawyer, attorney being sanctioned by the court for making mistakes and not redacting hundreds of people's bank information including bank account, routing number, check numbers, signatures, PayPal users information, names, addresses, email address which controls the money in their account. I know this was intentional. The Texas attorney has intentionally done the same. That attorney said he accidentally filed my social security number. He then refused to remove it until he gets what he wants. He stated that in email. He also posted my passport and refused to remove that as well. These are some very nasty people.

Below is proof Ashley Conlogue paid the sanction.

Ashley Hunt Ashley Conlogue attorney lawyer los angeles california bar 292083 ardensen law sanction violation fine

 Here is the minute order. The text reads as follows,

"ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS UNDER CCP SECTION 177.6 SHOUULD (SIC) NOT BE IMPOSED ON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 8/26/16 ORDER DIRECTING FORTHWITH ACTION TO SEAL OR REMOVE DOCUMENTS FILED IN VIOLATION OF CRC 1.20 (b) (2).

The cause is called for hearing.

The Court has considered Ms. Conlogue's Declaration. It appears that she failed to take timely and effective steps to remove the materials from public view in significant part because of overwork, but that is ws (sic) ultimatley done. The Court's original "forthwith" order was to vindicate privacy rights. The delay was unacceptable. Monstary (sic) sanctins (sic) in the sun of $100 are imposed on Ms. Comlogue (sic), payable to the Los Angeles Superior Court on or before December 5, 2016, per CCP Section 177.5." The court asst even got the name of the Plaintiff wrong.

Ashley Hunt Ashley Conlogue attorney lawyer los angeles california bar 292083 ardensen law sanction violation fine

Here is Ashley Conlogue's declaration. It's only 14 pages but for some reason it's a large file. Ashley Conlogue's excuse was she was busy. She supposedly works long weeks and long weekends. If she did court call she wouldn't have to waste three more hours per hearing. The hearings are generally very short yet she will sit in the court room from 8:30 a.m. to sometimes 1;30 p.m. doing nothing but billing her client $350/hr or whatever her firm's rate is. If she personally appears at all her hearings she is wasting hours per day.

Ashley Conlogue again lied in this statement. I never threatened to post her SSN for "hackers to find." I don't even have it. Also what is the difference between receiving a paper letter, fax or email? The means of the communication are irrelevant. I will of course be filing another complaint with the bar against Ashley Conlogue and her firm.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxE8KfVPjYF4Wk83OTgwVEFlbzQ/view?usp=sharing

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen Law sanctioned by Los Angeles Superior Court for contempt of court order

Attorney lawyer Ashley Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen, Cane Molnar law firm in Los Angeles, California was just sanctioned by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Ashley Hunt Conlogue violated the redaction rule by intentionally publicly filing a legal document with the full social security number, bank account numbers, routing numbers and other confidential data of many different people.

Ashley Conlogue did not appear in court. Instead attorney, lawyer John Fowler who is Of Consel for Arendsen Law Firm appeared in her stead. I did not receive a copy of Ashley Conlogue's motion and declaration. Per the Judge Ashley Conlogue argued that she was over worked logging in 3,000 hours a year. The Judge stated the firm of Arendsen Law is clearly under staffed. Still, it was Ashley's responsibility to redact the items.

The Judge also ruled that Ashley Conlogue was in contempt of the Judge's court order ordering her to seal the documents. Ashley stated earlier that she had never filed a motion to seal and had to research it. Ashley did not bother to write or file the motion until I told her that the documents are still online publicly. Even after the Judge wrote the order to seal Ashley did not file it with the clerk. I had to fax and call the clerk and their supervisors. The item was not redacted until November 2, 2016.

On top of all of this Ashley stated that her client Amanda Lollar did not post a copy of the filing online. That is of course false. Ashley and Amanda Lollar did not remove that file from the Internet. I had to do it myself by reporting the file. The entire blog, website was removed by WordPress as a violation of their terms of service.

The final order by the court today was another reprimand and $100 in sanctions payable to the court by Ashley Conlogue and Arendsen Law Firm. This will also end up on the State Bar record of Ashley Conlogue and Arendsen Law. Another complaint will be filed proving that Ashley Conlogue committed perjury and fraud in court documents and at the hearings. Ashley Conlogue falsely stated that I legally changed my name and SSN and she had proof. I have not done that so there is no proof. Ashley also stated that the court order stated they were allowed to have records where I was merely the signatory. That is false. The court order does not say that anywhere. I could go on and state more false items. Instead I'll publicly post the complaint to the bar and their responses online.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Conlogue to be sanctioned by the court for being in contempt of court order

Ashley Conlogue, Ashley Hunt attorney lawyer los angeles california sanctions contempt court order judge's order

This is to show how these sleazy people operate. They intentional violate court orders. They may be able to get away with it in corrupt Texas but not here in California.

The sanction hearing per Judge's order is 11/03/16. Ashley intentionally filed my SSN, bank records publicly. Then her client Plaintiff posted the same on the Internet. The records are under three protective orders. That is contempt of court orders. Hearing for those contempt violations is 10/27/16.

Judge Robert Hess ordered Ashley to file a motion to put the documents under seal August 26, 2016. Ashley refused. Three weeks later I saw the motion and exhibits on the public internet with my SSN.... I told Ashely to remove the document. I also told her she was supposed to file a motion to seal them August 26, 2016. Only very recently did Ashley file the motion. That is the reason for the current sanction. This is after Ashley was admonished for posting my SSN, bank records. I filed a report to the bar assoc about that. I will be sending in another complaint to the bar

Today Judge Hess ruled that exhibits D, E, F, H and I must be sealed. Those exhibits are still on the public internet. They are a violation of the current court order. I gave Ashley and the Arendsen firm notice of violation of the court orders.

I have a copy of the hearing. Ashley blamed the mistake on an assistant. Who is this assistant? Does Ashley even have an assistant?

After that Ashley blamed the mistake on her inexperience and stupidity. She said she'd never written a motion to seal before. She said she had to research it and that took weeks.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Illegal behavior by attorney, lawyer Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue in legal case in Los Angeles, California

UPDATE: Not only did Ashley Hunt Conlogue not follow the Court's order and delete her filed reply with my SSN and the financial data of many people but she had Plaintiff Lollar post it on the public Internet without even redacting the SSN. All of the records in that filing are under a protective order here in California and Texas. Ashley Hunt Conlogue has shown a flagrant disregard for the law and the Court.
________________________

This is not a direct part of the Texas case though it stems from it. It's just to show you that Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary gave her California attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen Cane Molnar law firm stolen documents besides heavily edited documents. Lollar convinced her incredibly stupid attorney to file them and to not even file them under seal. Some of the documents were under a protection order. Ashley Hunt Conlogue was willing to risk her license, destroy her reputation for a couple of grand in legal fees.

From email I sent to Los Angeles, California attorney, lawyer Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue.

"Attached please find a complaint I mailed and filed in court proceedings and to the California State Bar today against Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue. Ashely was severely reprimanded by Judge Robert Hess at an 8:30 hearing today in Dept 24 for this exact behavior. Hess stated it was sanction-able behavior. Hess is taking the matter under submission.

Ashley intentionally publicly filed stolen bank records, stolen PayPal records, unauthenticated documents, documents which were covered by a protective order in Texas and California and had to be filed under seal, social security number, bank account numbers, routing numbers, signatures, confidential banking data, confidential names, and confidential contact information of other people. This was also a violation of California Rule of Court 1.20. None of the items were redacted in the filing.

I instantly notified Ashley that she'd done this and she refused to delete the filing thereby allowing many people and organizations to be harmed by identity theft and bank theft.

I filed a letter and motion to the court demanding that the file be destroyed. In the meantime people will be harmed while the document is publicly available as Ashley refuses to remove it.

This complaint is a public document filed in court filings. It is privileged. I will be posting a copy online later on today."

Below is what was stated by Judge Robert Hess of Department 24 in Los Angeles Superior Court. I am asking for sanctions.

Judge Robert Hess: "Now, I'm going to admonish you, Plaintiff (attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue). You are NO longer, you will NEVER, ever, ever ... EVER submit papers with unredacted social security number, and that personal identifying information, PayPal account numbers, to the court. You KNOW you can't do that! And  the bank records not under seal, the account numbers, routing numbers. There may still be consequences. I will think about it."

The Judge did formally admonish Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue in writing in a filed court order. The text is,

"Plaintiff is admonished that submission of unredacted records containing Ms. Cummin's SSAN and Paypal account records, and the bank account and routing numbers for Animal Advocates, is unacceptable. Plaintiff shall forthwirth take steps to seal the offending documents, andor to substitute redcted copies, including submission of any necessary order. Further violation of CRC 1.120(b) will subject offending party to monetary sanctions."

The court typist spelled my name wrong and wrote the wrong code. It should be 1.20(b).

Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue, Ashley Hunt, Ashley Conlogue, admonished, sanction, punish, complaint california bar association

From the complaint.

August 26, 2016
Via email, fax and USPS
State Bar of California
Arendsen Cane Molnar LLP
Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue
Judge Robert Hess Dept 24

RE: Complaint against attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue State Bar 285277 Case BS140207

August 26, 2016

Via email, fax and USPS

State Bar of California

Arendsen Cane Molnar LLP

Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue

Judge Robert Hess Dept 24

RE: Complaint against attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue State Bar 285277 Case BS140207

August 12, 2016 attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue publicly filed the below document with the LA County Superior Court.

8/12/2016 12:00:00 AM - OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF AMANDA LOLLAR TO MOTION TO QUASH, MODIFY

SUBPOENA, PROTECTIVE ORDER OF DEFENDANT MARY CUMMINS; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST

DEFENDANT MARY CUMMINS IN THE SUM OF $2,988.00, 1-133 pages.

This document was not filed under seal. It’s in violation of protective orders in Texas and California. It contained the social security number of Defendant Mary Cummins, checks with full routing number, bank account numbers, signatures, names... The document also included stolen bank records and PayPal records. Attorney Ashley Hunt knew this when she filed it per email sent June 23, 2016 (Exhibit 1).

An email was sent to Ashley Hunt and Christian Molnar who is also an attorney in this case telling them they publicly filed a document with data which is not allowed per California Rule of Court 1.20, contains stolen documents… (Exhibit 2).

A letter was sent to the clerk and court advising them that the document contained forbidden data asking them to strike and destroy the document (Exhibit 3).

A reply was filed to Plaintiff's August 12, 2016 motion on August 24, 2016 (Exhibit 4) stating the documents were not redacted or filed under seal. Defendant also advised the attorney again that the Animal Advocates bank statements and all PayPal records were stolen. No one signed an authorization for Animal Advocates records. The Texas judge clearly stated that Plaintiff was not allowed to have the records of Animal Advocates. The authorization which Defendant did sign did not include any PayPal records. Plaintiff's Texas attorney forged an authorization and sent the forged authorization to the bank and PayPal to illegally receive those records. The PayPal data which was included was highly edited and put into an Excel chart.

At the August 26, 2016 hearing attorney Ashely Hunt also committed perjury by lying to the court. Hunt stated she did not receive the email service of Defendant's August 24, 2016 reply. That is a lie. Hunt received and opened it 46 seconds after it was sent (Exhibit 5). Defendant sent it to the email address which was listed as the contact email for Hunt in the State Bar of California directory.

In court Judge Robert Hess formally stated that attorney Hunt was clearly in the wrong for publicly filing unredacted documents with social security numbers, bank account numbers, signatures .... Judge Hess stated that Hunt's action was sanctionable. Judge Hess has not yet signed an order. The hearing was recorded. A transcript can be made if necessary.

In a previous hearing on May 10, 2016 attorney Hunt again committed perjury and defamed Defendant. Hunt stated that Defendant has a new name and social security number. Hunt stated she has proof. There was no proof. Defendant has never changed her name or social security number. Hunt was trying to smear the reputation of Defendant to the Judge.

I am asking that Ashely Hunt lose her license for intentionally filing confidential documents against California Rule of Court Rule 1.20, filing stolen documents and lying in court documents and at hearings. Attached is the formal complaint form and Exhibits. This complaint is privileged and public as it is being added to case BS140207, sent to the Court and State Bar of California. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call.

Sincerely,

Mary Cummins

Attached: Complaint, Exhibits

A copy of the complaint was sent to the lawyers and law firm. Ashley's husband is also a lawyer. They are both young, new lawyers but still should have known better. Ashley thought she could get away with it.

rvarghese@arendsenlaw.com,
anne@arendsenlaw.com,
slarkin@arendsenlaw.com,
jfowler@arendsenlaw.com,
nmolnar@arendsenlaw.com,
jdelpropost@arendsenlaw.com,
pschiada@arensdenlaw.com,
cmolnar@arendsenlaw.com,
harendsen@arendsenlaw.com,
ksc@kbklawyers.com

Here is the full complaint to the California Bar Association.

http://marycummins.com/FINAL%20complaint_ashley_marie_hunt%20letter.pdf

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate