Husband of Judge in my case sent me a Christmas card?

For some reason the husband of Judge R***** sent me a Christmas card. On the card is Martha whom I believe is a cousin of Justice ****** Sudderth from my original case. I filed a motion to recuse Judge R***** but she refused saying there was no conflict of interest. After she heard the case and read the documents the Judge instantly recused herself. I'm glad she was not willing to do the judicial favor for her friend Randy Turner. Of course the case was just transferred to another court. That judge was willing to do the favor for Randy Turner.

In the current case which is in appeal Plaintiff Amanda Lollar defamed herself then blamed me for her defamation. Lollar forged the evidence adding allegedly defamatory statements by a "Mary Cummins" within the statute of limitations period. In reality no comments were made by anyone on those articles at that time. On top of that forgery Lollar forged emails allegedly from the head of USDA Dr Robert Gibbens. The emails clear her of all wrongdoing years after she lost her USDA permit. Gibbens stated those forged emails don't exist. This is how crazy this case is. We shall see what this appeals court will do.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Hunt Conlogue was sanctioned and fined by the Court for contempt of court orders, violations redaction rule

Here is more evidence of Ashley Marie Conlogue, Ashley Hunt a Los Angeles, California lawyer, attorney being sanctioned by the court for making mistakes and not redacting hundreds of people's bank information including bank account, routing number, check numbers, signatures, PayPal users information, names, addresses, email address which controls the money in their account. I know this was intentional. The Texas attorney has intentionally done the same. That attorney said he accidentally filed my social security number. He then refused to remove it until he gets what he wants. He stated that in email. He also posted my passport and refused to remove that as well. These are some very nasty people.

Below is proof Ashley Conlogue paid the sanction.

Ashley Hunt Ashley Conlogue attorney lawyer los angeles california bar 292083 ardensen law sanction violation fine

 Here is the minute order. The text reads as follows,

"ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS UNDER CCP SECTION 177.6 SHOUULD (SIC) NOT BE IMPOSED ON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 8/26/16 ORDER DIRECTING FORTHWITH ACTION TO SEAL OR REMOVE DOCUMENTS FILED IN VIOLATION OF CRC 1.20 (b) (2).

The cause is called for hearing.

The Court has considered Ms. Conlogue's Declaration. It appears that she failed to take timely and effective steps to remove the materials from public view in significant part because of overwork, but that is ws (sic) ultimatley done. The Court's original "forthwith" order was to vindicate privacy rights. The delay was unacceptable. Monstary (sic) sanctins (sic) in the sun of $100 are imposed on Ms. Comlogue (sic), payable to the Los Angeles Superior Court on or before December 5, 2016, per CCP Section 177.5." The court asst even got the name of the Plaintiff wrong.

Ashley Hunt Ashley Conlogue attorney lawyer los angeles california bar 292083 ardensen law sanction violation fine

Here is Ashley Conlogue's declaration. It's only 14 pages but for some reason it's a large file. Ashley Conlogue's excuse was she was busy. She supposedly works long weeks and long weekends. If she did court call she wouldn't have to waste three more hours per hearing. The hearings are generally very short yet she will sit in the court room from 8:30 a.m. to sometimes 1;30 p.m. doing nothing but billing her client $350/hr or whatever her firm's rate is. If she personally appears at all her hearings she is wasting hours per day.

Ashley Conlogue again lied in this statement. I never threatened to post her SSN for "hackers to find." I don't even have it. Also what is the difference between receiving a paper letter, fax or email? The means of the communication are irrelevant. I will of course be filing another complaint with the bar against Ashley Conlogue and her firm.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxE8KfVPjYF4Wk83OTgwVEFlbzQ/view?usp=sharing

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen Law sanctioned by Los Angeles Superior Court for contempt of court order

Attorney lawyer Ashley Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen, Cane Molnar law firm in Los Angeles, California was just sanctioned by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Ashley Hunt Conlogue violated the redaction rule by intentionally publicly filing a legal document with the full social security number, bank account numbers, routing numbers and other confidential data of many different people.

Ashley Conlogue did not appear in court. Instead attorney, lawyer John Fowler who is Of Consel for Arendsen Law Firm appeared in her stead. I did not receive a copy of Ashley Conlogue's motion and declaration. Per the Judge Ashley Conlogue argued that she was over worked logging in 3,000 hours a year. The Judge stated the firm of Arendsen Law is clearly under staffed. Still, it was Ashley's responsibility to redact the items.

The Judge also ruled that Ashley Conlogue was in contempt of the Judge's court order ordering her to seal the documents. Ashley stated earlier that she had never filed a motion to seal and had to research it. Ashley did not bother to write or file the motion until I told her that the documents are still online publicly. Even after the Judge wrote the order to seal Ashley did not file it with the clerk. I had to fax and call the clerk and their supervisors. The item was not redacted until November 2, 2016.

On top of all of this Ashley stated that her client Amanda Lollar did not post a copy of the filing online. That is of course false. Ashley and Amanda Lollar did not remove that file from the Internet. I had to do it myself by reporting the file. The entire blog, website was removed by WordPress as a violation of their terms of service.

The final order by the court today was another reprimand and $100 in sanctions payable to the court by Ashley Conlogue and Arendsen Law Firm. This will also end up on the State Bar record of Ashley Conlogue and Arendsen Law. Another complaint will be filed proving that Ashley Conlogue committed perjury and fraud in court documents and at the hearings. Ashley Conlogue falsely stated that I legally changed my name and SSN and she had proof. I have not done that so there is no proof. Ashley also stated that the court order stated they were allowed to have records where I was merely the signatory. That is false. The court order does not say that anywhere. I could go on and state more false items. Instead I'll publicly post the complaint to the bar and their responses online.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Randy Turner Fort Worth, Texas attorney lawyer continues on his downward spiral

Below is the result of an independent robot which monitors Randy Turner's business website randyturner.com specifically this page if you remove the spaces http://www.randy turner.co m/index.php/ra ndys-cyber-stal ker Almost every single night Randy Turner edits this 38 page long rambling defamatory rant about me. Almost every word is linked to some photo or document. Most of what he's written is false. This is evidence that Randy Turner has some sort of mental degeneration. Randy Turner has been doing this for a few years straight almost every single night. Randy Turner needs some help. His wife Patti needs to get him to a doctor. His judgment gets worse and worse every day. Randy Turner updated this page immediately after I got one of the other nasty blogs removed.  I think maybe Randy Turner is having some marital issues. For some reason Patti's relatives are saying that Patti and Randy are good friends. WTH does that mean? Of course a married couple will be good friends. Did they divorce? Did they finally become friends again after a fight or something? Patti needs to get this man to a doctor even if she has to force him into a 72 hr hold. I showed the police this page and they said the writer has major mental issues. What 61 year old man talks about the size of a woman's breasts when she was 11? Randy Turner. View changes:  2016-10-13 20:18    49 new words, 27 deleted words, <1% change

... on the internet. Witness after witness testified about AmandaMary Cummins’s lovecynical belief that she could ... supreme court justice with compliments, devotion flirtatious obsequiousness, and compassion toward animals a photograph of herself when ... writing a book about corruption and totally disproved each and every ... Mary Cummins had spread across cronyism in the internet. Texas courts.” ...    more...

View changes:  2016-10-12 20:19    28 new words, 32 deleted words, <1% change

... on the internet. Witness after witness testified about Amanda’s love, devotion and compassion toward animals and totally disproved each and every hideous lie that Mary Cummins has even been known to spend weeks at had spread across the courthouse, stalking a trial in which one of her victims was a witness and then reporting” on his use of the bathroominternet. © Randy Turner

View changes:  2016-10-11 08:07    29 new words, 47 deleted words, <1% change

... on the internet. This is indeed ironic coming from Mary Cummins has even been known to spend weeks at the courthouse, stalking a woman who stalks trial in which one of her victims’ emails (see Stalking” paragraph below ... blogs attacking them, sues them, and was ordered by acourt to pay $6 million for egregious witness and maliciousthen reporting” defamation.) on his use of the bathroom. © Randy Turner ...   more...

View changes:  2016-10-08 09:00    50 new words, 20 deleted words, <1% change

... on the internet. Mary Cummins uses technology to secretly track This is indeed ironic coming from a woman who stalks her victims’ locationsemails (see Stalking” paragraph below), files police ... , creates countless blogs attacking them, sues them, and identify the computers they are using when they read their emails. was ordered by a court to pay $6 million for egregious and malicious” defamation.) ...    more...

View changes:  2016-10-06 08:35    18 new words, 56 deleted words, <1% change

... on the internet. However, her fake page does ... business or company, owes millions Mary Cummins uses technology to one of secretly trackher victims for egregious, intentional, ’ locations and malicious” defamation, and secretly stalks other people’s identify the computers they are using when they read their emails. © Randy    more... When you search for Randy Turner you see his crazy, defamatory ihatemary page he added to his business website. This means that everyone who searches for him sees his ihatemary page. Who would want to do business with someone who makes a page like that. No one. Notice he now offers mediation. Randy Turner is the last person who should mediate. He blew up in his own mediation in this case. Judge told us to sit down and come to terms. I agreed. Then Randy Turner said he would only agree to remove his ihatemary pages if I removed every negative website, blog, page written about him made by other people. I told him it's physically impossible for me to remove other people's websites. Then he quickly stood up, his face red, vein popping out on his forehead and he yelled "then no deal!" and almost ran out of the 352nd District courtroom. Randy Turner should never be a mediator.

RandyTurner.com Randy Turner Fort Worth Texas attorney lawyer website mediation about personal injury contact us experience cyberstalker

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Attorney Ashley Conlogue to be sanctioned by the court for being in contempt of court order

Ashley Conlogue, Ashley Hunt attorney lawyer los angeles california sanctions contempt court order judge's order

This is to show how these sleazy people operate. They intentional violate court orders. They may be able to get away with it in corrupt Texas but not here in California.

The sanction hearing per Judge's order is 11/03/16. Ashley intentionally filed my SSN, bank records publicly. Then her client Plaintiff posted the same on the Internet. The records are under three protective orders. That is contempt of court orders. Hearing for those contempt violations is 10/27/16.

Judge Robert Hess ordered Ashley to file a motion to put the documents under seal August 26, 2016. Ashley refused. Three weeks later I saw the motion and exhibits on the public internet with my SSN.... I told Ashely to remove the document. I also told her she was supposed to file a motion to seal them August 26, 2016. Only very recently did Ashley file the motion. That is the reason for the current sanction. This is after Ashley was admonished for posting my SSN, bank records. I filed a report to the bar assoc about that. I will be sending in another complaint to the bar

Today Judge Hess ruled that exhibits D, E, F, H and I must be sealed. Those exhibits are still on the public internet. They are a violation of the current court order. I gave Ashley and the Arendsen firm notice of violation of the court orders.

I have a copy of the hearing. Ashley blamed the mistake on an assistant. Who is this assistant? Does Ashley even have an assistant?

After that Ashley blamed the mistake on her inexperience and stupidity. She said she'd never written a motion to seal before. She said she had to research it and that took weeks.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Illegal behavior by attorney, lawyer Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue in legal case in Los Angeles, California

UPDATE: Not only did Ashley Hunt Conlogue not follow the Court's order and delete her filed reply with my SSN and the financial data of many people but she had Plaintiff Lollar post it on the public Internet without even redacting the SSN. All of the records in that filing are under a protective order here in California and Texas. Ashley Hunt Conlogue has shown a flagrant disregard for the law and the Court.
________________________

This is not a direct part of the Texas case though it stems from it. It's just to show you that Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary gave her California attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue of Arendsen Cane Molnar law firm stolen documents besides heavily edited documents. Lollar convinced her incredibly stupid attorney to file them and to not even file them under seal. Some of the documents were under a protection order. Ashley Hunt Conlogue was willing to risk her license, destroy her reputation for a couple of grand in legal fees.

From email I sent to Los Angeles, California attorney, lawyer Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue.

"Attached please find a complaint I mailed and filed in court proceedings and to the California State Bar today against Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue. Ashely was severely reprimanded by Judge Robert Hess at an 8:30 hearing today in Dept 24 for this exact behavior. Hess stated it was sanction-able behavior. Hess is taking the matter under submission.

Ashley intentionally publicly filed stolen bank records, stolen PayPal records, unauthenticated documents, documents which were covered by a protective order in Texas and California and had to be filed under seal, social security number, bank account numbers, routing numbers, signatures, confidential banking data, confidential names, and confidential contact information of other people. This was also a violation of California Rule of Court 1.20. None of the items were redacted in the filing.

I instantly notified Ashley that she'd done this and she refused to delete the filing thereby allowing many people and organizations to be harmed by identity theft and bank theft.

I filed a letter and motion to the court demanding that the file be destroyed. In the meantime people will be harmed while the document is publicly available as Ashley refuses to remove it.

This complaint is a public document filed in court filings. It is privileged. I will be posting a copy online later on today."

Below is what was stated by Judge Robert Hess of Department 24 in Los Angeles Superior Court. I am asking for sanctions.

Judge Robert Hess: "Now, I'm going to admonish you, Plaintiff (attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue). You are NO longer, you will NEVER, ever, ever ... EVER submit papers with unredacted social security number, and that personal identifying information, PayPal account numbers, to the court. You KNOW you can't do that! And  the bank records not under seal, the account numbers, routing numbers. There may still be consequences. I will think about it."

The Judge did formally admonish Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue in writing in a filed court order. The text is,

"Plaintiff is admonished that submission of unredacted records containing Ms. Cummin's SSAN and Paypal account records, and the bank account and routing numbers for Animal Advocates, is unacceptable. Plaintiff shall forthwirth take steps to seal the offending documents, andor to substitute redcted copies, including submission of any necessary order. Further violation of CRC 1.120(b) will subject offending party to monetary sanctions."

The court typist spelled my name wrong and wrote the wrong code. It should be 1.20(b).

Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue, Ashley Hunt, Ashley Conlogue, admonished, sanction, punish, complaint california bar association

From the complaint.

August 26, 2016
Via email, fax and USPS
State Bar of California
Arendsen Cane Molnar LLP
Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue
Judge Robert Hess Dept 24

RE: Complaint against attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue State Bar 285277 Case BS140207

August 26, 2016

Via email, fax and USPS

State Bar of California

Arendsen Cane Molnar LLP

Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue

Judge Robert Hess Dept 24

RE: Complaint against attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue State Bar 285277 Case BS140207

August 12, 2016 attorney Ashley Marie Hunt Conlogue publicly filed the below document with the LA County Superior Court.

8/12/2016 12:00:00 AM - OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF AMANDA LOLLAR TO MOTION TO QUASH, MODIFY

SUBPOENA, PROTECTIVE ORDER OF DEFENDANT MARY CUMMINS; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST

DEFENDANT MARY CUMMINS IN THE SUM OF $2,988.00, 1-133 pages.

This document was not filed under seal. It’s in violation of protective orders in Texas and California. It contained the social security number of Defendant Mary Cummins, checks with full routing number, bank account numbers, signatures, names... The document also included stolen bank records and PayPal records. Attorney Ashley Hunt knew this when she filed it per email sent June 23, 2016 (Exhibit 1).

An email was sent to Ashley Hunt and Christian Molnar who is also an attorney in this case telling them they publicly filed a document with data which is not allowed per California Rule of Court 1.20, contains stolen documents… (Exhibit 2).

A letter was sent to the clerk and court advising them that the document contained forbidden data asking them to strike and destroy the document (Exhibit 3).

A reply was filed to Plaintiff's August 12, 2016 motion on August 24, 2016 (Exhibit 4) stating the documents were not redacted or filed under seal. Defendant also advised the attorney again that the Animal Advocates bank statements and all PayPal records were stolen. No one signed an authorization for Animal Advocates records. The Texas judge clearly stated that Plaintiff was not allowed to have the records of Animal Advocates. The authorization which Defendant did sign did not include any PayPal records. Plaintiff's Texas attorney forged an authorization and sent the forged authorization to the bank and PayPal to illegally receive those records. The PayPal data which was included was highly edited and put into an Excel chart.

At the August 26, 2016 hearing attorney Ashely Hunt also committed perjury by lying to the court. Hunt stated she did not receive the email service of Defendant's August 24, 2016 reply. That is a lie. Hunt received and opened it 46 seconds after it was sent (Exhibit 5). Defendant sent it to the email address which was listed as the contact email for Hunt in the State Bar of California directory.

In court Judge Robert Hess formally stated that attorney Hunt was clearly in the wrong for publicly filing unredacted documents with social security numbers, bank account numbers, signatures .... Judge Hess stated that Hunt's action was sanctionable. Judge Hess has not yet signed an order. The hearing was recorded. A transcript can be made if necessary.

In a previous hearing on May 10, 2016 attorney Hunt again committed perjury and defamed Defendant. Hunt stated that Defendant has a new name and social security number. Hunt stated she has proof. There was no proof. Defendant has never changed her name or social security number. Hunt was trying to smear the reputation of Defendant to the Judge.

I am asking that Ashely Hunt lose her license for intentionally filing confidential documents against California Rule of Court Rule 1.20, filing stolen documents and lying in court documents and at hearings. Attached is the formal complaint form and Exhibits. This complaint is privileged and public as it is being added to case BS140207, sent to the Court and State Bar of California. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call.

Sincerely,

Mary Cummins

Attached: Complaint, Exhibits

A copy of the complaint was sent to the lawyers and law firm. Ashley's husband is also a lawyer. They are both young, new lawyers but still should have known better. Ashley thought she could get away with it.

rvarghese@arendsenlaw.com,
anne@arendsenlaw.com,
slarkin@arendsenlaw.com,
jfowler@arendsenlaw.com,
nmolnar@arendsenlaw.com,
jdelpropost@arendsenlaw.com,
pschiada@arensdenlaw.com,
cmolnar@arendsenlaw.com,
harendsen@arendsenlaw.com,
ksc@kbklawyers.com

Here is the full complaint to the California Bar Association.

http://marycummins.com/FINAL%20complaint_ashley_marie_hunt%20letter.pdf

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Won the appeal of the contests to indigence

UPDATE: I just noticed they changed the docket format in county court 3. There were only one line entries previously. The now opened them into two line entries so you can see what was filed. I now see the court reporter filed something. Why didn't I ever get a copy? They have to file and serve via eFileTexas.gov It doesn't cost anything and saves paper and postage. The court reporter did not send me her contest. I have to get a copy. Thank god I replied to "contests." I thought there were two. I didn't realize there were three. Just like in 10/2012.

Below is a representation of the change in docket.

________________________________

Finally had the time to read the order more thoroughly. It seems the Court Reporter also filed a contest June 20, 2016. She never requested for it to be heard. It was never heard. It was also never served on me. I was not given notice. I never even got a copy. How can these people be so openly corrupt? I will continue to post all the documents and information on this case so people can see this corruption first hand. I now have to pray for a just panel of Justices. I already requested that Justice Sudderth, Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot not serve on the panel. Justice Meier, Justice Gabriel also cannot be on the panel. There will be three Justices on the panel. I assume they must be Justices Walker, Gardner and Livingston. I see they teach at the same schools, are on the same panels, commissions, bars ... as Randy Turner and his wife. I have to hope they will value the law and justice over personal friendships.
_____________________________

The Appeals Court agreed with my argument that the contests were not heard timely and are therefore overruled. That's the law.

Amazing Judge Mike Hrabal knew that I was in the right yet still ruled against me. He knowingly ruled against the law and evidence. It was his own court reporter who made the blunder about the hearing date. I should be thankful. That's probably why court reporters should not try to fill in for court coordinators. They don't know when hearings have to be set. I was shocked when she emailed and said she wanted to change the date. Then she instantly emailed back desperately begging to change it again. Too late.

It's just so shocking that a Judge who swore an oath to uphold the law would work so hard to deprive me of a fair hearing and justice. The corruption in Texas is beyond mind boggling. If these people don't want to uphold the law, they should get another job.

Texas attorney Randy Turner again using his connections to get Judges, court reporters, court coordinators and the DA to do his bidding. Who in their right mind would blindly do what Turner tells them to do? It's only gotten Judges, court reporters in trouble.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Yesterday was hearing for contests to indigence. Judge Mike Hrabal ruled ... I have no idea how he ruled

UPDATE: July 15, 2016:  I just got the court reporter's record. THANK GOD I AUDIO RECORDED THE HEARING! The court reporter cut out what I said. She said in the transcript she couldn't hear me. No one there said that in the audio. How do these people sleep at night doing such unethical, criminal things?

Here is the transcript which is clearly missing my testimony. Shari Steen, Shari Jan Steen (CSR # 4954) NEVER said she couldn't hear me. She never asked me to repeat anything. She knew I audio recorded the hearing yet was still willing to make this false transcription.

http://marycummins.com/transcript%2007112016.pdf

And here's what actually was said.

http://marycummins.com/hearing%20texas%2007112016.mp3

Here is from my email where I tell them I must audio record the hearing. I gave legal notice.

"From: Mary Cummins [mailto:@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 11:03 AM
To: Carla Phelps; Shari J. Steen
Subject: Is there still hearing 7/11 1:00 pm for case 2015-002259-3?

Will there still be a hearing 7/11/16 1:00 pm for indigence, motion telephonic appearance? My indigence was affirmed as no order on contests was made within the allotted time period, see attached. If there is still a hearing, I will be appearing by phone. I am again requesting a court reporter. I will have to audio record the hearing as the court reporter has refused to give me the transcripts. The reporter also audio records the hearings. All parties have already agreed to that. My indigence has now been affirmed in the trial and appeals court for this case. Thanks."

The corruption is unbelievable. And all for what? Just because they want to remove government documents and a video which prove Amanda Lollar committed animal cruelty, violated the Animal Welfare Act and lost her permit.

http://www.marycummins.com/amanda_lollar_bat_world_sactuary_usda_cancelled.pdf

________________________________

The corruption continues. I gave notice that I'd audio record the hearing. I will post it later today and send it to the courts and parties.

I filed a notice to include this in the file. I gave notice the hearing would be recorded. Here is the 5:31 audio mp3. The court reporter also made an audio recording.

http://marycummins.com/hearing%20texas%2007112016.mp3

I have no idea what Judge Mike Hrabal ruled. In court he said "I have no jurisdiction as this affidavit is not notarized. I can't rule." Then Randy Turner handed him an order to sign. I was not allowed to see the order before it was signed. I was not given a chance to object. I have no idea what it says. The docket states as follows,

07/11/2016 Pauper's Contest  (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Hrabal, Mike)
Result: Held
07/11/2016 Order       Doc ID# 67
07/11/2016 Appeal - Electronic Confirmation of Notice of Appeal       Doc ID# 68
07/11/2016 Record - Other
07/11/2016 Notice of Appeal       Doc ID# 69

The person representing the clerk sounded embarrassed to even make her non argument. She said "I would need information in order to reply." She has the affidavit. She has the information. I don't yet know if she's complicit in this unethical treatment so I'll refrain from commenting.

Judge Hrabal seemed confused as to how to respond. I know they had ex-parte communications again without me present before the hearing. They did that at the previous ridiculous hearing as well. They confer to try to figure out a way for me to lose even though the evidence and law proves I'm in the right.

Why in the world are these lawyers, Judges doing whatever Randy Turner says? Based on his court history, behavior, filing motion to strike his own witness, inappropriate behavior with me, motion abuse, forgery, fraud and perjury they should not be doing what he says.

Who in their right mind can read Randy Turner's business website where he has his ihatemary page and think he is sane? A licensed Texas attorney should not be posting bizarre false things about a case where he is representing a party. He definitely should not be talking about the size of my breasts when I was 11. There is something very wrong with Randy Turner.

http://web.archive.org/web/20141222203948/http://www.randyturner.com/index.php/randys-cyber-stalker

This was basically the same thing that happened in the last case. I appealed the denial of the oral ruling.

I just received notice from Second Court of Appeals that I appealed the denial of indigence. The trial court must give the appeals court and me a copy of the transcript for review. I'm pretty sure the appeals court must rule for me. This was even more corrupt that the first time I was denied in 2012.

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-16-00165-CV&coa=coa02

The order was just posted online at the link. Here is a jpg of it. Randy Turner wrote it and the Judge signed it. In court Judge Hrabal said he had no jurisdiction to rule. After the hearing is over he signed this.

Judge Mike Hrabal, order, Randy Turner, Randall Turner

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Corruption in case 2015-002259-3 continues. Even Court Reporter trying to deny me a fair hearing

Filed in County Court 3 and Second Court of Appeals of Texas. In Texas some lawyers and Judges are so corrupt that they brag about how corrupt they and the Judges are while standing in the courtroom. Plaintiff's attorney Randy Turner told me "I've known this Judge for years. He'll sign anything I put in front of him." The retired, visiting Judge signed every order Randy Turner wrote including the Facts & Findings without even reading or editing.

Mary Cummins
645 W 9th St #110-140
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Direct: (310) **7-4770
m****@aol.com

www.MaryCummins.com

July 6, 2016

Per eFileTexas.gov

Plaintiff’s Attorney Randy Turner

Shari Steen Court Reporter

Tarrant County Clerk

Judge Mike Hrabal

County Court 3

100 E. Weatherford St, Room 290A

Fort Worth, TX, 76196-0240

RE: Request for Court Record, Transcripts Amanda Lollar vs Mary Cummins, 2015-002259-3, Mary Cummins v Amanda Lollar appeal 02-00185-CV.

I am officially requesting the entire court record for case 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3 for my appeal. I am also requesting that the court record for case 352-248169-10 and appeal 02-12-00285-CV[1] be included in the court record. The reason is that case 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3 is an identical copy/paste of case 352-248169-10. These records were referred to and incorporated in my motion to dismiss. The court does not need to recreate the 352-248169-10, 02-12-00285-CV court records. I still have my copy and so does Plaintiff as they posted it on the Internet after the 2012 trial.

I filed an affidavit of indigence in case 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3[2] January 6, 2016. Plaintiff filed a contest. It was set and reset for hearing February 16, 2016. At the time of hearing Plaintiff did not wish for it to be heard. Judge Jennifer Rymell heard the motion to dismiss then recused herself as she did not want to rule on it.

Case was transferred to County Court 3 to Judge Mike Hrabal. It was set for hearing April 4, 2016. Judge Hrabal cancelled the hearing and reset it for May 17, 2016. Plaintiff did not request for the contest to be heard at the May 17, 2016 hearing. It was not heard. The time to contest the 2015-002259-3 affidavit of indigence passed. The contest is therefore denied and Defendant Cummins is legally declared indigent.

The court refused to allow Defendant to file documents or receive minutes without paying. Court reporter Shari Steen refused to give the motion to dismiss hearing transcript to Defendant without a signed and filed court order by Judge Mike Hrabal. Defendant filed a motion requesting a signed and filed court order on indigence. Judge Mike Hrabal refused.

Defendant filed notice of appeal May 17, 2016. June 10, 2016 Defendant filed a new affidavit of indigence for appeal of the motion to dismiss case appeal # 02-16-00165-CV[3]. Plaintiff and County Clerk filed contests of indigence June 13, 2016. Hearing was scheduled for July 1, 2016. Hearing was cancelled by the Clerk due to conflicting schedule. It was rescheduled by the court reporter for July 11, 2016. After the reporter realized her mistake she frantically tried to schedule the hearing for July 2, 2016 but Defendant was in the hospital the entire day with pre-surgery appointments for a severe back injury. Court reporter nonetheless stated it would be heard July 11, 2016 knowing that would be too late hoping that Defendant didn’t realize this.

The contests were not heard per Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h)(4). Notice shall be given and the hearing shall be held within the deadlines set out in the rules of appellate procedure. See id. R. 20.1(i)(1) (trial court must set hearing and notify parties), (2) (hearing must be held within ten days of date trial court receives referral of contest), (3) (trial court may extend time for hearing for up to twenty days), (4) (contest is deemed overruled unless trial court signs order sustaining contest within period set for hearing).

The contests had to be heard at the latest 20 days from date of contests June 13, 2016 which was July 3, 2016. The time to hear both the trial court and appeal contests to indigence is long over. Therefore the contests have been over ruled.

I am requesting the court record and transcript of hearing on motion to dismiss free of charge. The court record is already in pdf format. It will be quick and easy to zip the pdfs, burn to disc or email to parties.

In the alternative the trial court can just file an order dismissing this case. Not only did Plaintiff and their attorney Randy Turner forge the evidence including a forged email allegedly by the head of the USDA but they perjured themselves in their sworn affidavits stating the email and exhibits were authentic. New evidence also proves that Plaintiff and their attorney committed perjury and fraud in the original 352-248169-10 case. Plaintiff was found by the USDA to have committed animal cruelty, abuse, neglect and violated the Animal Welfare Act in 2011[4]. Plaintiff lost their permit before the 2012 trial yet stated in trial they had their permit and were cleared of all wrong doing by all agencies. That is completely false. This allegation was the basis of the entire 352^nd case.

Because of the forgery, fraud and perjury involved in the case filings the case should be dismissed outright. Plaintiff's attorney Randy Turner and Plaintiff Amanda Lollar need to be charged and prosecuted for their crimes. Randy Turner needs to be disbarred. The order on the 352-248169-10 case should be reversed. This case must be dismissed because the sworn evidence was forged.

Here is but one of the forged exhibits. They were all exactly like this. Amanda Lollar's forged Exhibit 5[5]. The actual Exhibit 5 in my brief[6]. The actual Exhibit 5 as it resides publicly online[7]. This is an Internet defamation case. The exhibits must be viewed online to compensate for viewer’s individual browser differences. There is no comment by “Mary Cummins” or anyone on that date, time. That article and comments were not made by Defendant.

Here are three different versions of the forged email allegedly by the head of the USDA[8]. USDA stated in writing the email does not exist. Randy Turner used this forged email to argue in Plaintiff’s reply to motion to dismiss that the 2011 email written by veterinarian Dr Laurie Gage in Colorado is MY defamation in the current case filed in 2015 in Texas years out of the statute of limitation! This “argument” proves that Randy Turner is not fit to practice law. Turner’s ihatemary page proves his extreme personal obsession with me. In this page Turner not only defames me with wild allegations of me allegedly suing my grandmother but he talks about the size of my breasts when I was 11[9].

On top of all of this the case must be dismissed at the minimum as it's copy/paste the 352nd case including reversed claims. Per res judicata it "cannot be pursued further by the same parties." Plaintiff filed this case for malicious intent and harassment purposes only immediately after the opinion on the 352nd case was released. Plaintiff and her attorney merely want get government reports and video of Plaintiff committing animal cruelty removed from the Internet permanently. Plaintiff is merely embarrassed by Plaintiff’s own illegal and cruel behavior. Defendant has never defamed Plaintiff. Plaintiff Lollar and her attorney Randy Turner have defamed and harassed Defendant. If the case proceeds, Defendant will counter sue for defamation and harassment.

Sincerely,

Mary Cummins

cc: Second Court of Appeals
ACLU-NC
Public Citizen

---

[1] Mary Cummins v Amanda Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary Appeal 2012 http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-12-00285-CV&coa=coa02

[2] Amanda Lollar v Mary Cummins 2015-002259-3 https://odyssey.tarrantcounty.com/PublicAccess/default.aspx

[3] Mary Cummins v Amanda Lollar Appeal http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-16-00165-CV&coa=coa02

[4] USDA states Amanda Lollar violated Animal Welfare Act, caused “pain, suffering and death.” http://www.marycummins.com/amanda_lollar_bat_world_sactuary_usda_cancelled.pdf

[5] Plaintiff Lollar Exhibit 5 http://animaladvocates.us/exhibit%205.pdf

[6] Defendant’s actual copy of Exhibit 5 http://animaladvocates.us/def_exhibit_5.pdf

[7] Actual, public, live Exhibit 5 online https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/02/21/18732538.php

[8] Forged USDA emails made by Plaintiff Lollar, sworn by Randy Turner http://animaladvocates.us/usda_email_forgery_proof.pdf

[9] Randy Turner’s ihatemary page in his business website http://web.archive.org/web/20141222203948/http://www.randyturner.com/index.php/randys-cyber-stalker

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Court, attorney doing everything in their power to deprive me of a fair trial

The county court, clerk and Texas attorney Randy Turner are doing everything in their power again to prevent me from having a fair trial. Court refuses to sign order on indigence. Court stated they signed order on motion to dismiss but it wasn't filed and I didn't receive it. The clerk must send, file documents via efiletexas.gov but they are refusing to do so. Court reporter won't give me the transcript of the hearing without payment. Documenting everything and cc'ing it to Appeals Court and others.

Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Mary Cummins, Amanda Lollar, Bat World, Bat World Sanctuary, Randy Turner, Randall Turner, Randall E Turner, Randall Eugene Turner, attorney, lawyer, fort worth, texas, tarrant county, second court of appeals, 352-248169-10, 352nd District Court, Judge Bonnie Sudderth, Justice Bonnie Sudderth, Judge William Brigham, Justice William Brigham, 2015-002259-2, 2015-002259-3, 02-12-00285-CV, 02-16-00165-CV, county court 3, Judge Mike Hrabal, Mike Hrabal, Judge Jennifer Rymell, Jennifer Rymell, defamation, libel, slander, breach of contract, forgery, fraud, perjury, disbar, unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate

Amended notice of appeal Mary Cummins v Amanda Lollar 2015-002259-3, 02-16-00165-CV

Appeal No. 02-16-00165-CV

County Court Case No. 2015-002259-3

AMANDA LOLLAR,                          Plaintiff,             vs. MARY CUMMINS,                          Defendant Pro se

COUNTY COURT 3 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

DEFENDANT’S AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

    Defendant, Mary Cummins, files this amended notice of appeal per the Second Court of Appeal’s June 7, 2016 letter. Defendant, Mary Cummins desires to appeal from the oral order by the Court on May 17, 2016 to the Second District Court of Appeals of Texas. The oral order was a denial of the motion to dismiss. As of today Judge Mike Hrabal who presides over Tarrant County Court 3 refuses to write, sign, file an order on Motion to Dismiss[1] per Defamation Mitigation Act, Citizen Participation Act, Forgery, Fraud, Perjury, Lack of Jurisdiction and Statute of Limitations (Exhibit 1, Docket).

     The current case is 2015-002259-3. It was originally filed as 2015-002259-2 until Judge Jennifer Rymell voluntarily recused herself after hearing the Motion to Dismiss[2] and refusing to rule. Judge Mike Hrabal was then assigned the case by Judge Evans.

     The current case is copy/paste the 352-248169-10 case including claims which were reversed on appeal. This case was instantly filed after this court released their opinion in case 12-02-00185-CV April 2015. Randy Turner even included all of the reversed claims including the breach of contract claim. This was intentional to try to make the forum be Tarrant County, Texas per the void contract instead of California court which is the proper jurisdiction and venue. Plaintiff has repeatedly stated that Defendant allegedly defamed Plaintiff only while in California. Defendant has never defamed Plaintiff.

     In the original case Plaintiffs did not show elements of defamation or even state which items they felt were defamatory. Second Court of Appeals ruled that “defamation is assumed.” They also ruled that Defendant should have filed a rare motion to force Plaintiffs to identify the defamatory items. The alleged defamatory items were never identified in the trial or appeals court. The word “defamation” is not in that trial court order. A list of the allegedly defamatory comments was never made.

     The Defamation Mitigation Act and Citizen Participation Act both passed after Defendant was originally sued because of cases identical to Defendant’s. Plaintiff now had to specifically identify the alleged defamation, send a cease and desist letter then send proof that the items are indeed defamatory. Plaintiff failed to do these things before filing the current case.

     Because Defendant never defamed Plaintiff there was no evidence of defamation. Plaintiff Amanda Lollar and Randy Turner then forged the evidence in this case. Lollar added defamatory comments within the statute of limitations period and signed Defendant’s name to the anonymous public posts. The actual public articles with comments do not have a comment made by anyone on that date and time. There are no comments by Defendant. All of the exhibits were forged in the same manner. Here is but one of the forged exhibits. They were all exactly like this. Amanda Lollar's forged Exhibit 5[3]. The actual Exhibit 5 in my brief[4]. The actual Exhibit 5 online[5]. This is an Internet defamation case. The exhibits must be viewed online to compensate for viewer’s individual browser differences. There is no comment by “Mary Cummins” or anyone on that date, time. All entries in that website are anonymous.

     Plaintiff Amanda Lollar also forged an email from the head of the USDA clearing her of all wrong doing. In actuality the USDA sent an email stating Lollar was investigated and found guilty of causing “bats pain, suffering and death” and Lollar “violated the Animal Welfare Act” (Exhibit 3). The definition of “animal cruelty” is “pain, suffering and death.” Lollar’s USDA permit was then cancelled. The forged emails are dated two years after Lollar lost her USDA permit. There are actually three different versions of the forgery made and posted by Lollar which Defendant included in the Motion to Dismiss[6]. One forgery was included in the complaint in this case. Freedom of Information Act responses prove that no such email exists. The USDA would not clear someone of wrong doing two years after finding them guilty of wrong doing and cancelling their permit. In this current case Plaintiff argues that the 2011 email in Exhibit 3 written by Dr Laurie Gage of the USDA in Colorado is Defendant’s defamation. The claim and argument is beyond bizarre. Defendant believes Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner is not fit to practice law. Previously Turner filed a motion to strike his own expert. In the motion Turner viciously trashes his own expert not realizing it’s his own expert[7]. Defendant told Turner that it was his own expert. Turner still set the motion for a hearing.

     As Plaintiff Lollar and attorney Turner both wrote and signed sworn affidavits and motions stating the exhibits, USDA email were authentic, they committed perjury. Randy Turner needs to be disbarred. Both Turner and Lollar should be charged with forgery, fraud and perjury. Defendant requests that this court forward this document to authorities and the State Bar so action may be taken.

     In this case not only has Defendant never defamed Plaintiff but Plaintiff Lollar and her attorney Randy Turner have defamed Defendant. Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner has a 35 pg singled spaced ihatemary page in his business website[8] independently confirmed by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Turner talks about the size of Defendant’s breasts when she was 11 years old in this site. Turner also falsely states that Defendant sued her grandmother, the bishop, is wanted by the law, has committed crimes… all completely false.

     Plaintiff Lollar has over 400 blogs devoted to defaming Defendant. Those blogs also talk about Defendant’s “breasts,” “ass,” “vagina,” “vomit,” “poop” and include child pornography using Defendant’s face. Here is but one post[9] certified by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Defendant was forced to file police reports with the Fort Worth Police Department. The FWPD actually identified the child pornography, not Defendant.

     Defendant requests that Justice Bonnie Sudderth not be on the panel for this appeal. Justice Sudderth was the sitting judge for the previous identical case and is biased. Justice Sudderth requested two vacations for one specific injunction hearing and the trial. Both times then Judge Bonnie Sudderth specifically requested Judge William Brigham to oversee the proceedings. Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner bragged to Defendant in court “I’ve known this judge for years. He’ll sign anything I put in front of him.” Defendant witnessed Judge William Brigham sign an order written by Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner without even reading it. Judge William Brigham did sign every order written by Randy Turner without edits. Randy Turner even sent the final court order to Judge Brigham’s personal residence. Judge Brigham never even signed an oath of office after the assignments or before the hearing and trial. The judgment in the original case is therefore void. Justice Bonnie Sudderth and 84 year old retired Judge William Brigham clearly “gamed the system”[10] using their positions to help their friend Randy Turner.

     Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner also mentions Justice Bonnie Sudderth personally in Plaintiff’s reply to motion to dismiss. Turner mentions a website SudderthCoverup[11] written years before Defendant ever went to Texas and tries to insinuate that Defendant is involved in the website. That is false. The website most likely written by one of the prosecuting attorneys also has nothing to do with this case. The website is about Justice Bonnie Sudderth using her position as Judge to speak as a character witness for her brother Sky Sudderth in his criminal case for alleged child rape in 2007.

     Defendant requests that the Justices on the panel for appeal of the identical previous case 12-02-00285-CV[12] i.e. Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot, Justice Bill Meier, Justice Lee Gabriel, not be on the panel for this appeal as they are biased.

     The Justices took 18 months to write an approximately 80 page opinion stating that Defendant defamed Plaintiff with malice when Defendant has NEVER defamed Plaintiff. Plaintiffs in that case NEVER stated what they felt was allegedly defamatory. Justice Dauphinot stated that indigent out of state pro se Defendant should have known to write a rare legal demand to request a list of the defamatory statements. Justice Dauphinot then stated “defamation is assumed” and “doesn’t have to be proven.” Justice Dauphinot repeatedly misquoted the record even adding items which were never in any legal filing. Justice Dauphinot even personally attacked Defendant in the opinion. Justice Dauphinot mentions the amicus briefs[13],[14] filed by Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen who has been a freedom of speech lawyer for over 40 years and David Casselman of Cambodia Wildlife Sanctuary and ElephantsinCrisis.org then Justice Dauphinot dismissed them. The amicus briefs supported Defendant’s own arguments.

     Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot stated in the opinion in that case that Defendant did not argue damages in the case. Plaintiff Lollar in the trial admitted Lollar had no proof of any damages or causation by Defendant. There were no damages to argue! Pro se defendant was never advised of defendant’s right to object to the Facts & Findings, Conclusions of Law which were written by Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner and signed by Judge William Brigham unedited. Not objecting did not mean Defendant agreed with the Facts & Findings, Conclusion of law. Of course Defendant would never agree to a $6,176,000 judgement when there was not a penny of actual loss or damages, Defendant never defamed Plaintiff and Defendant is penniless.

     After the opinion was released Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner continued to brag about his close relationships with the Judges and Justices in the case. Randy Turner and his wife Patti Gearhart-Turner have been lawyers in Fort Worth, Texas for over 30 years. They are on many panels, boards, committees with these same Judges and Justices in this case and the previous one. Randy Turner in his business websites brags about his communications with the Justices.

     In the previous case UCLA freedom of speech lawyer professor Eugene Volokh even wrote an article about the opinion[15] stating the opinion was clearly in the wrong in regard to protection for media defendants. Defendant was and still is media. In the previous case Plaintiff Lollar bragged in court many times that Lollar was a public figure in regard to bats and non-profits. Justice Dauphinot merely stated Lollar was not a public figure, Defendant is not media so defamation would not have to be proven. Justice Dauphinot even stated Defendant never stated Defendant was indigent until after the trial. That is completely false. For Justice Dauphinot to affirm $3,000,000 in compensatory damages and $3,000,000 in exemplary damages when there were no damages whatsoever and Defendant had a negative net worth is beyond surreal. As the claim was allegedly with malice this is an unjust life long financial death sentence for Defendant.

     In Plaintiff’s reply to motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s attorney Randy Turner for no reason includes information about Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot’s son’s criminal record stating it’s not really his criminal record. Defendant believes Turner did this to further defame Defendant to the Judges and Justices in this case. Randy Turner has been having ex-parte communications with the Judges, Justices in this case. For this reason Justice Dauphinot should not be on the panel in this appeal.

     For all these reasons the new case must be dismissed. The older identical case must also be reversed as Plaintiff’s have unclean hands as they forged the evidence, committed fraud and perjury. Defendant must appeal the Motion to Dismiss which was denied by Judge Mike Hrabal in County Court 3. This  notice of appeal is filed in County Court 3 and the Second Court of Appeals of Texas. Defendant requests a stay in the case on appeal.

           

                                                                           ________________________________

Mary Cummins, Defendant Pro se

                                                                                  

---

[1] Mary Cummins’ Motion to Dismiss per Defamation Mitigation Act, Citizen Participation Act, Forgery, Perjury, Fraud, Lack of Jurisdiction, Statute of Limitations (minus filed exhibits) http://animaladvocates.us/DEFENDANT_motion_dismiss.pdf

[2] Mary Cummins Motion to Dismiss w/o Exhibits http://animaladvocates.us/DEFENDANT_motion_dismiss.pdf

[3] Plaintiff Lollar’s Exhibit 5 http://animaladvocates.us/exhibit%205.pdf

[4] Defendant’s Exhibit 5 http://animaladvocates.us/def_exhibit_5.pdf

[5] Real online Exhibit 5 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/02/21/18732538.php

[6] Three USDA emails forged by Lollar http://animaladvocates.us/usda_email_forgery_proof.pdf

[7] Randy Turner files Motion to Strike his own Expert http://animaladvocates.us/batWorldLawsuit/motion_strike_expert.pdf

[8] Randy Turner’s ihatemary page in his business website http://web.archive.org/web/20141206181833/http:/www.randyturner.com/index.php/randys-cyber-stalker

[9] Amanda Lollar defamatory, bizarre blog post about Defendant http://web.archive.org/web/20150902095338/http://mary-cummins.co/2014/10/28/is-mary-cummins-obsessed-with-pedophilia/

[10] Gaming the Judicial System http://marycummins.com/eliminate%20assigned%20judges.pdf

[11] SudderthCoverup website http://web.archive.org/web/20110128081632/http://sudderthcoverup.com/

[12] Mary Cummins v Amanda Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary 12-02-00285-CV http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-12-00285-CV&coa=coa02

[13] Paul Alan Levy, Public Citizen, amicus brief http://www.animaladvocates.us/cummins_amicus_brief.pdf

[14] David Casselman, ElephantsinCrisis.org, Cambodia Wildlife Sanctuary http://www.animaladvocates.us/mary_cummins_v_bat_world_sanctuary_amicus_letter.pdf

[15] Eugene Volokh, Washington Post, ‘Nonmedia’ speakers don’t get full First Amendment protection, rules a Texas Court of Appeals panel https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/04/20/nonmedia-speakers-dont-get-full-first-amendment-protection-rules-the-texas-court-of-appeals/